- Feedback
- Browse Issues
- Create Issue
Improving Weapon License Dynamics on IMRP
Suggestion:
Currently on the server there is a Weapon License system that allows players to purchase weapons from Ammu-Nation. However, in practice this system is creating serious gameplay issues.
Legal factions, especially PD, are actively trying to revoke players’ weapon licenses as much as possible. The problem is that without a weapon license the server becomes extremely frustrating and almost unplayable, especially for players who want to participate in conflicts or defend themselves.
At the same time, PD is also looking for gunfights and more action on the server. But constantly revoking weapon licenses creates the opposite effect: players cannot obtain weapons easily, which reduces the overall gameplay experience.
Proposed Solution
I suggest introducing two new business mechanics or modifying the current Ammu-Nation system.
If an alliance controls the turf where an Ammu-Nation is located, members of that alliance should not be required to have a weapon license to purchase weapons from that Ammu-Nation.
This would:
Encourage alliances to fight for and control strategic locations
Increase turf wars and faction activity
Reduce frustration caused by constant license revocations
Create a risk-reward dynamic for controlling important areas
Players who are not part of the alliance controlling the turf would still need a weapon license as usual.
Balancing for Legal Factions
To balance this system, legal factions should be given more tools to respond:
Allow legal factions to use Hunters, Sparrows, and Tanks when defending or retaking turfs.
Bring back NOOSE as an active support faction.
Currently, NOOSE appears to be inactive and mostly occupied by old admin alt accounts or inactive players. Instead, it should be run by active legal players who can support SAPD and SASF during large conflicts and turf operations.
I believe the Head of Legal (HOL) and server management can determine the exact balance and implementation, but the main goal should be to improve server dynamics and make gameplay more engaging for everyone.
Who benefits:
This system would:
Create more dynamic turf wars
Reduce frustration related to weapon licenses
Encourage alliances to fight for territory and legal factions
Give legal factions meaningful tools to respond
Who is hurt:
I cant think of any.
Comments (16)
+1 .
Fantastic, but instead of Legals getting to use tanks and hunters, or in short special vehicles, there should be another type of advantage given. Few suggestion are:
Im not sure tho about allowing legal factions to use tanks hunters but in my opinion NOOSE should definitely run by active players who want to contribute to legal side which will lead extra active snipers to legal side support them at the turf
Additionally even tho turf is captured by illegal factions PD can attempt to raid the business same as illegal factions attempt to rob businesses
so another special turf, could work i guess, except the hunter/sparrow part =)
Good idea hester
Good idea mamen
Do not let legals to use sparrows/hunters/tanks in turfs
Something interesting
Good suggestion must be implemented
It could work, but I'm worried about legals getting heavy stuff like tanks and hunters. It will probably get abused and make playing really frustrating for illegals. Also yes for NOOSE.
If you add more turfs for legals then sure, otherwise it will just give illegals power to get weps without buying a weplic that costs around 8m, so as you mentioned it will get PD more fun, that wont happen cause we would not even know if there is a turf being taken at the ammunation, or make all ammunation turfs available for PD/SASF and if PD/SASF owns the turf then a weapon license is necessary for everyone
I’m with you. I never buy a weapon license because I feel like it’s a waste for a fast-paced player like me. I enjoy fighting the cops, and escaping when they try to taze me feels really good. But a lot of the time the PD catches you in situations like 8v1 or they surprise you from behind, and you end up getting your weapon license revoked. Maybe changing the infraction system so that every 2.9 counts as just 1 infraction and maybe 2.10 counts as 2(simple solution) could be a good idea.
Nowadays 8M is a lot of money, and on top of that the cops bully you and make fun of you if they take your license. My solution is to always withdraw a small amount of materials from my house and just play the way I like, without worrying about all that stuff. If I bought a license, it would probably make me play more scared. Luckily, I can afford materials.
I fully support this suggestion. The current weapon license system is creating more frustration than fun, especially for players who just want to enjoy the game and defend themselves. Linking weapon purchases to turf control is a brilliant idea—it would give alliances a real strategic reason to fight and make faction conflicts more meaningful.
But i'm not su that balancing it with stronger tools for legal factions, like Hunters would keep things fair.
I agree with the weapon license part but not the other two.
It's not fair for illegals for legals to use heavy vehicles in turfs, it's not even a contest, you'd fail immediately
There's really no problem with legal agency member activity which needs to be fixed by making NOOSE a functioning faction again, not to mention the IC conflicts it would bring back in legal agencies.
about the weplic no , they already lowered it from 2weeks to 1week what else do u want ? and about all the rest yes
Hh, all the rest was only to compensate for weplic.
You must be logged in to comment.
Login to Comment